Archive for the 'Customer Acquisition' Category

IA TV: Google Video - The Future of Search?

This VERY interesting video was posted to the IA TV Blog and it shows some truly impactful new features in Google, but I have yet to see these features from Google in the wild.  Has anyone else?  Check it out: Google Video - The Future of Search?

Coat-tails and Situational Awareness

Let’s imagine for a moment that you were a partner (or, rather, a coat-tail rider) for one of the most anticipated product launches of the year. The whole Internet is talking about the product — so much so that online services like Twitter are going into red-alert just to handle the mobs of people talking about the product.

Yes, I’m talking to you, AT&T. For the multitudes of iPhone prospects now visiting your site, they are seeing the following:

ATT Wireless Homepage, the day after the iPhone Launch.  (I have put a red box around the iPhone portion)

I’ve added a red box to show the EXCELLENT placement of the iPhone advertisement. Unfortunately, clicking on this item sends me to the following page:

After clicking on the iPhone on the home page, this is what you see.

(Perhaps they didn’t know the product was launching?)

This wasn’t a case study… I was trying to find out more about the phone! I’m ready to order, pre-order, or simply gawk. I’d have provided my email address. I’d have sent the page to friends. I’ve have blogged about it (in a good way). Even though I can’t buy this product for a month, I could make my purchase decision today, or I could simply become a valuable lead for AT&T to use on July 11th.

Lost financial opportunity for sure, but this also leaves with a decidedly negative impression of AT&T which will become a permanent part of how I view the brand.

Your website is the first place most customers will turn for the latest information and news. Make sure you maintain situational awareness of the role your brand plays in the current web/etail landscape. It means dollars in the door — and a stronger brand.

Diagram: Customer Lifecycle and Differences in Online & Offline Media Consumption

Gang,

cltposting.pngAttached to this post is a diagram I use quite a lot to describe the online media landscape and the etail customer lifecycle. It continues to evolve, but I thought I’d share it. Click for the full size version. Some key points and takeaways:

  • Customers are at different stages: This simple truism is oft forgotten. Customers come from different stages in the buying cycle; what may be appropriate for your most loyal customer, might not be appropriate for someone trying your product for the first time. And despite the clear arrow at top moving from left to right, it’s important that customers move back and forth quite a lot — the sales funnel is less like a funnel than it is like a popcorn popper.
  • Pursuing competitor evangelists is often a waste of time and resources. You’ll find that your competitors’ true evangelists may in fact be your worse prospects. Note the opposing arrows on the diagram and the relationship between “your” conception of customer-lifecycle-stage and your competitor’s perception of the very same individual. Remember the “popcorn popper” concept: instead of bombarding happy customers of your competitor with costly interruption marketing, wait instead for those customers to “pop” out of the evangelist column (read: wait for your competition to screw up.)
  • Online media consumption is different: When we recognize that customers may be at different stages in the lifecycle, we (naturally) target messages differently: for offline awareness we might use a billboard, and for offline customer service we might send a personal letter. While this spectrum of communications methods seems clear, what’s less than obvious is that it’s unlikely that any individual customer will be seeing the billboard and reading the letter at the same time. That is, in the offline world, media tactics are usually separate and distinct because of geography, format, and media consumption patterns.The same is not true online. A customer performing a search might see a pay-per-click ad, then a banner, then read a customer service review, then visit a website… all in a single user session. The separation of messages we enjoy offline rarely exists on the Internet. In addition, customers evolve more quickly: a web visitor might transition from being a “stranger” to an “evangelist” (by writing a review) all within a single site visit.
  • Online conversion and offline conversion strategies are different: In online communications that drive online response, the primary goal is action. In these cases, customer response can be immediate (i.e. if they receive an online message, they can immediately respond/act by visiting the website). Design these communications with the goal of quick action towards conversion without necessarily trying to embed a lasting memory or impression. For online communications that drive offline actions, our primary goal is instead “recognition and memory” of the offer and benefit. Users responding to an online promotion requiring offline action need to remember that promotion during their next drive past your store.

Ultimately, this means we need to think a bit differently about online marketing. While technologies like behavioral targeting might make it easier to identify buying signals and place customers at the appropriate stage in the sales funnel, the reality is that most marketers won’t be employing such sophisticated (and expensive) techniques. For the have-nots (e.g. you and I!) it’s important that we consider these factors during offer and creative design, and that we — above all — insist on consistency and clarity in brand messaging.

Why I Love Shopping Comparison Engines… and Why I Hate Shopping Comparison Engines

Comparison Engines are an Important Ingredient in Your Etail Marketing Strategy

I’ve been meaning to post about comparison engines for some time now. Comparison engines are, of course, one of the core etail marketing channels, And yet, comparison engines remain relatively underused by smaller retailers and unoptimized by large ones. There is a general lack of understanding of how shoppers really use these engines, and as such, opportunities for improvement are large.

Etail is 180 from Old Fashioned Retail

Ultimately the rise of shopping comparison engines is an indication that retail strategy has turned a complete 180 since the time of our grandparents. At the turn of the century (the last one, not this one :-) it mattered not what brand/product you bought — rather, it was the relationship with the retailer which mattered most. You bought bread from your grocer, not “Wonder” from whomever. You went to the tailor, rather than choosing a brand of suit and finding someone who sold them. Brands did not exist in their current format.

If You Can’t Beat Em, Join Em (but Still Try to Put them Out of Business)

No more. Now, it’s all about the brand of the product you want to buy, rather than the relationship you wish to have with the retailer. (This has the unfortunately side-effect of making price comparisons the largest factor in determining where to buy.) While we all work hard to reverse the trend, participation in Shopping Comparison Engines is both a tacit acceptance of this change and an appropriate hedging strategy in case our efforts to change the game ultimately fail.

While the death of comparison engines has been widely and (I think) erroneously reported, I would very much like to see them change dramatically. Right now, while outstanding results can be generated, they require careful and time-consuming management as well at a good tactical approach. For small businesses, this almost always means outsourcing feed management (which may be a better solution for larger retailers as well).

Already, BazaarVoice, Shopify, Buzzillions, and PowerReviews seem to be developing the next generation of comparison engines. The other guys just hope you’ll discover every little feature and manage them carefully. I hope that this next generation of entrants provides comparison options beyond the typical (cost, shipping, tax) — so that we’ll all be able to compete on things other than price.

There you have it: my roundup on comparison engines. Now, while you deal with these CSEs, don’t forget to build an incomparable brand.

Customer Lifecycle Redux

I generally find it helpful to think of digital marketing activities as embodying one or more of the following “types” of marketing:

  1. Brand Marketing … which demonstrates the promise of the brand in way which ensures it becomes part of the customer’s consideration set for the category. Brand marketing (especially in the form of PR activities) is often the first way in which customers gain awareness of a product/brand, and it becomes (at the other end of the customer lifecycle) the primary way through which they reference, represent, and refer the product/brand to other buyers.
  2. Product Marketing … which demonstrates features and benefits of the product/brand and does so in a way to drive trial or comparison.
  3. Promotional Marketing … which provides additional incentive or urgency to drive a conversion (typically by satisfying a customer’s pricing needs). Promotions are often driven by supply chain issues (too many of a product, a closeout, etc.) or by a recognition that different segments of customers exist — each with a different pricing tolerance.

As such, building effective brand experiences into a website is key, but so is the process of providing detailed and appropriate product information and effective promotional marketing. Covering all portions of the customer lifecycle — even if it means just hitting the basics — is the right way to drive lasting sales online.

And these rules apply not just to your website, but to your email marketing as well.