Monthly Archive for May, 2007

Brands and Consumption Space: May 24 2007

I’m a brand guy. One important aspect of brand is that it functions in memory — when you make a purchase decision (these days) there is rarely a salesperson on hand, rarely a brochure explaining features and benefits. Instead, you form a consideration set based on your memory and belief in particular brands.

From time to time, I try to note (from memory) of all the (national) brands I remember interacting with in one day. So, here’s Thursday May 24, in relatively chronological order; I mention only my first notice of the brand… and I am not counting signs or brands viewed, nor websites or blogs visited — just the brands I directly interact with.

  1. Boston Acoustics
  2. GE
  3. Phillips
  4. Dial
  5. Neutrogena
  6. Edge Gel
  7. Gillette
  8. Kiehl’s
  9. Glaxo-SmithKline (Flovent)
  10. Braun
  11. Arm and Hammer
  12. Hanes
  13. Polo
  14. Brooks Brothers
  15. Tommy Hilfiger
  16. Invicta
  17. Allen Edmonds
  18. Bunn
  19. Thermos
  20. Coach
  21. Booq (now leaving the house)
  22. Saab
  23. NPR
  24. Motorola
  25. Parrot Systems
  26. Apple
  27. Brandi Carlisle
  28. Counting Crows
  29. Feist
  30. Samsung (arriving work)
  31. Levenger (Circa)
  32. Lamy
  33. Staples
  34. HP
  35. Microsoft
  36. Glaceau
  37. AOL (AIM)
  38. Lucent Technologies
  39. Canon
  40. Kodak
  41. Toshiba
  42. City of Rochester (leaving work)
  43. Grey Goose
  44. Sennheiser
  45. Carrier
  46. University of Rochester (leaving speaking event)
  47. Subway
  48. Corona
  49. Gateway
  50. Sony
  51. Comedy Central (The Daily Show)
  52. Serta

Fifty-two brands — not counting the local brands, the brands I saw but with which I didn’t interact, and the brands I viewed online. The bad news (for brands hoping to get my attention) is that I interact with nearly every one of these brands every single day. Every single day. That means I’m continually having experiences which drive my memory or affinity in these brands.

Lastly, note that I didn’t buy anything — other than food or drink — all day.

How do you get through?

Are Infrastructure Investments in Store?

An nice general summary of emerging etail trends at Internet Retailer. Since apparel has been taking a bath lately, perhaps more savvy retailers will look online for salvation? If they do, they should choose wisely. Excerpt:

“For… almost all of today’s retailers, that means keeping abreast of—and in some cases taking initial steps to participate in — e-retailing trends that are likely to grow in importance over the next several years:

  • Tighter and more customer-serving integration of information across web, store and call centers;
  • More online video and a move toward web TV;
  • Emergence of the cell phone and other wireless devices as both online shopping and payment devices;
  • Social retailing as well as social networking;
  • New web site applications such as a site search feature sthat, similar to Like.com for Internet search, enables shoppers to search for products based on particular characteristics like color or fabric.”

(Their conference is quite good, by the way.)

Top Retailer “Add to Cart” Buttons

Another interesting post at Elastic Path (which is getting better and better, actually).  This time it’s the Add to Cart Buttons of 107 Top Etailers.

Enjoy.

Checkout Features of the Top 100 Retailers

A nice overview of checkout features and their use (in the Top 100 Retail Sites) is available from Elastic Path.

Four Types of Etail Email

As a general rule, email is not terribly well used by etail firms. Here’s why.

List Matters Most: the 50/40/10 Rule

Direct marketers know that the main determinant of program success is not creative execution, but rather the quality of the list. After the list, the quality of the offer comes next…. and creative execution is a distant third priority. As a rule of thumb, think of the list as 50% of the value, the offer as 40%, and the creative as 10%.

That’s good news, right? Not really. Since email list acquisition is SO easy (just ask any spammer) we tend to think that we’re all set and should move right on to making a good offer to those customers. But in reality, the rules that apply to offline list generation still apply to email: it’s not about mailing letters to everyone in the white pages, it’s about identifying those segments into relevant and structured target audiences.

In this regard, I often recommend that etailers think of three types of email communications when thinking about list segmentation and quality:

Customer Acquisition Email. This relatively obvious category depends highly on list quality. The good news is that since etailers are often paying for these lists, they think carefully about list quality. The bad news is that list quality is often “high” in terms of the people on the list, but very low when it comes to the list source and optin status. Reputable etailers do their brand SERIOUS HARM when they purchase “opt in” lists comprised of hijacked email addresses. Yes, the quality of the contacts matters, but the source of those contacts matters too.

Customer Retention. Typically, these emails come in the form of monthly “newsletters” and too often the only offer contained in the newsletter is a coupon of some sort. If you have nothing more to say than “10% off!” you may want to work on your editorial calendar a bit more.

Self-Segmentation. This type of email isn’t usually on the etail radar. These emails are constructed with the primary purpose of soliciting a response from the customer which drives segmentation detail, rather than a sale. Ask a question… but not in so many words. While surveys are an obvious way to gain segmentation data, the inbound link activity from a carefully constructed email can provide dramatic insight.

But remember… Customer segmentation is not just about knowing your customers’ demographic profiles, but understanding what sort of customer they are at the time you want to communicate to them.

Context Matters

We don’t give context enough credit. Why? Primarily it’s because our etail marketing organizations aren’t integrated enough — the email group doesn’t necessarily coordinate their activities in real time with the online components of the business. Remember: even a one day lag in this regard can seem very strange to the customer. For example, how many of us have received offers on our next purchase from an etailer even before our first order with them has arrived? It happens all the time.

Receiving a coupon for my next order when I’ve not yet received my first is confusing and annoying. (Can’t I apply this coupon against what I just ordered?) It also just makes etailers look dumb.

But context extends beyond the obvious. When ordering flowers on May 10, it’s a safe assumption they are for Mother’s day. When asking for gift wrap on virtually any item, it’s likely the gift is for an annual event such as a birthday. And yet, armed with this incredibly relevant information, how many etailers have contacted you a year later to remind you of the event, prompt an order, and offer a discount (which benefits both you and them)? If your experience is like mine, then the answer is “none.” Amazing.

Every box checked during the checkout process provides detail and context about the shopper. Use it.

Service vs. Marketing Emails: No Difference

I will continue to assert that an online customer needs to be “reacquired” for each sale — every new sale is a new competitive experience, and etailers must play to win… every time. The emails sent post-sale to “service” the transaction (from shipping notices to tracking numbers to follow-on communications) have one special attribute: in these communications, you are not competing for the consumers attention.

Think about it. Compared to how quickly you delete marketing spam, how quickly do you eliminate a shipping notification or tracking email? Not nearly as quickly.

Now the bad news. Just as the email and online portions of etail groups can sometimes forget to coordinate their efforts, the service and fulfillment portions of the business are often very separate from the marketing portions. This is a shame.

While those “service people” may be in the warehouse down the street (or in a call center on the other side of the world) it’s important to consider the role of their communications in customer lifecycle. When these departments are in play, consumer attention to communications is abnormally high.

These “service emails” are the fourth and final type of email that I recommend etailers consider carefully. They represent a true source of customer access and can play strongly on the credence and experiential aspects of post sale service.