Monthly Archive for May, 2008

Changemaking, Free Shipping, and 99 cent McNuggets

I drove through McDonald’s this morning and ordered chicken mcnuggets. The price? Four for $0.99 or six for $2.99. In four packs, nuggets are 25 cents, but in six packs, they are 50 cents! Since I’m not as dumb as I used to be, and I provisioned my mcnuggets in packs of four. I force McDonald’s to incur more costs, and I enjoy a larger consumer surplus.

This experience reminded me of a practice I regularly employ on Amazon.com. When ordering something for, say, $20, I typically add items to my order to break the $25 barrier and get free shipping. That’s exactly what Amazon wants, yes? The problem is that I routinely add the same item to my cart to reach the minimum basket size. What item? Batteries????????. AAs, Cs, Ds… I don’t care, they all get used because I have small children (and I never run out, in spite of nearly endless toys beeping and buzzing).

This is a problem for Amazon, because batteries are extremely heavy to ship. By adding them to my basket, I get free shipping, but Amazon actually pays more in shipping costs. Batteries are an excellent change-maker for me, but a terrible one for Amazon. I am forcing Amazon to bear the entire cost of the shipping surplus and I am likely stealing most (or all, or more than all!) of the additional profit associated with the batteries.

In rural areas and foreign lands, the change-maker is often penny candy (Chiclets especially). If a transaction comes up near a currency threshold (a whole bill or coin), often the storekeeper will offer candy as change instead of currency. The consumer wins (they typically get more candy than the face value of the currency due) and the retailer wins as well (the candy costs less than the currency would). In this manner, the retailer and consumer split the surplus and everyone wins.

For all us etailers running incentives and upsells at the cart level, are we encouraging those sales which raise our actual margins, or are we simply giving more surplus to the consumer because we’re using blunt measures (e.g. basket size) to measure success?

Since I have small children, candy would be an effective change-maker for me at Amazon.

Cotton candy would, as you can already see, be the ultimate profit engine here.

Best Titles for Website Sections

I spend a fair amount of time on LinkedIn Answers; it helps me monitor the zeitgeist and expands my perspective around a buncha topics. Here’s a recent question (and my answer) regarding high-level navigation choices. It’s a “basics” item, but those are sometimes the ones where we need the most reminding:

Steve Meade asked:

What are the best titles to use for website navigation? Is there something better than the standard “about us”, “services”, “resources”, etc? If you try to be more creative does that just confuse people?

And I answered:

I agree that user conventions should be leveraged, but ultimately if these are the primary navigational choices on your site, then your site it not doing much for your business.

You sell bikes? How about “Road Bikes” “Mountain Bikes” and “Accessories” as your top level links.

You do consulting work? How about “MnA Consulting” “HR Consulting” and “Brand Consulting” as your nav choices.

Trust me: anyone who is looking for your “about us” or “contact us” content will find it — even it it’s in tiny type in the header or footer. What they WON’T find easily is the message/differentiation of your company, and placing those ideas into the navigational/information structure of your site is the first and most critical step to designing a site that benefits your business.

So yes, stick with the standard options for these “maintenance” links, but invest serious time and energy into communicating your business model or meeting primary user goals directly in the navigation.

In large part, retailers might translate this advice pretty simply as “put the things you sell right out there in the front window.”  Indeed.  And yet how many of us are doing this most effectively?

See the whole QnA here.

Site Renovations

Gang,

We’re undergoing some improvements at etailology over the next few days.  Let me know how you like them!   Also, I’ll be condensing the categories in the hopes of focusing the blog a bit more — around strategy, great etail models and concepts, etc. .  I’ll be writing/posting less about etail news and tactics (though I will be providing a reading list … stay tuned!) and more about the ideas and concepts I can uniquely bring (a la my customer experience, woot.com, etc. postings).

Keep the comments and email coming.  :-)

–David

Mobile IM is Expected to Be the Next Killer App (via FrogBlog)

Great. Now that etailers are generally starting to discover the value in SMS marketing, frogblog reports that IM is Expected to Be the Next Killer App.

First: I agree.

Second: That doesn’t mean it’s a good marketing platform.

Third: Etailers should still focus on gaining traction with SMS as the core of their mobile marketing campaigns.

Fourth: Your thoughts? Enter your comments below…

Hear 2.0: “It doesnt have a Wienie”

A great article via Hear 2.0: “It doesnt have a Wienie”.

It talks about the “finishing touch” as part of a consumer experience…. in this case, the example (and the term “weinie”) comes from Walt Disney, but once you understand the concept I’m sure you’ll be able to identify countless examples.

Does your customer experience have a wienie?