Tag Archive for 'Consumption Space'

Using Social Media for Ecommerce Marketing

I know, I know. We’re all supposed to use social media, but we don’t know how. Well, here are some places to look for inspiration:

[techtags: social+media, social+media+for+ecommerce, etail, online+marketing+using+social+media, facebook, twitter, del.icio.us, myspace, marketing+on+facebook, marketing+on+twitter]

LifeStreams + Consumption Space = Etail Customer Understanding?

A friend recently put me onto David Armano’s blog (Logic+Emotion) and I enjoy it a great deal. David works for Critical Mass, which is among the very best of web development companies in the world (we’ve done a bit of work with that firm, so I’m talking both from reputation and first-hand experience). His recent post on LifeStreaming is a good description of the emerging centricity which “webby” people (and, in a generation, everyone) long for in their social and daily computing habits.

Simply put, it’s a way to envision how online and offline activities flow together into a single lifestyle. It reminded me very much of a notable but very brief post from Dynamist.com on “Conspicuous Consumption in an Intangible Economy.”

LifeStreams, in my own interpretation of Armano’s parlance, are a way of viewing that intangible consumption which often characterizes participation in and affiliation with brands — be they individuals, products, corporations, religions, or whatnot. While David was focused (I think) a bit more on online lifestyle, I’ll try to extend the idea to brands both online and off.

LifeStreaming = Non-Commercial Consumption Space?

On the subject of consumption, I often use the idea of “consumption space” to describe how brands and users/customers interact in an ideal fashion.

The idea of Consumption Space comes from the assumption that customers know best when it comes to how brands and products are – or are not – a part of their daily lives. Rather than imposing ad hoc segmentation on target audiences, consumption space analysis respects customers’ unique approach to brands.

A Consumption Space is defined by re-envisioning product categories by basing product and brand associations on measurable and observable consumer thoughts and activities. That is, a consumption space is how an individual consumer organizes the consumption of brands and products (and, hence, the brands) within a particular area of their lives.

Guidelines for Consumption Spaces:

  • Every single customer will have a unique consumption space for your product or brand. (A particular brand – yours – may not be in that space at all.)
  • Customers have no concept of “category,” so this descriptor of product and brand associations has no relevance when pursuing a customer-centric approach.
  • There is not necessarily only one Consumption Space per traditional category. Consumption spaces can overlap, contain, or exclude, other consumption spaces and product categories.
  • Consumers may have hundreds of Consumption Spaces that they do not recognize or which they do not innately feel are organized. (Which, therefore, represent big opportunities for Brands to become organizing influences in those spaces.)
  • Consumption Spaces are experienced by consumers in their daily lives. They cannot be “imagined” by marketers – rather they should be measured, observed (and respected).

How is Brand Membership related to the Consumption Space?

  • Consumers may have hundreds of disorganized (therefore, to them, non-existent) consumption spaces.
  • When a customer is a true member of a brand, it is likely that they will choose to organize their consumption space around that brand.
  • Building Brand Membership in customers is a method for placing your brand at the center of that consumer’s relevant consumption space.
  • A customer’s Brand Memberships are often reason enough for them to reorganize their consumption spaces around specific brands.

Is there a Conclusion to this Post/Concept Coming?

Not really. These are loosely formed thoughts worth exploring. What I do know is that the power of brands is increasingly in how they relate to other brands — and, therefore — in the way that customers organize their consumption spaces.

Etailers would do well to consider the increasing complexity consumers deal with when organizing their online lives — and to position their etail brands at the center of user consumption spaces by forming connections and relationships with other brands. A good place to start? Facebook. Get familiar with our the app/plugin architecture links consumption/lifestyle activities/brands to each other and to the social graph.

Last but not least, thanks for the Tweet link David. :-)

[techtags: etail, customer+behavior, branding, online+branding, lifestreams]

Brand Importance: Product Descriptions vs. Retailer Identity

The need for brands was initially spawned by national companies who wished to compete with local manufacturers – an opportunity brought on by mass production and Rail’s ability to distribute products more widely. Brands have since evolved from a “logo and mark” to complete personalities which capture the essence of how businesses wish to relate to their customers.

But, as consumers gain increasing control over the sales process, and as the Internet broadens the reach of even small organizations, branding is undergoing a dramatic change. Just recently, the CEO of Proctor and Gamble said that customers don’t remember brand attributes, they remember brand experiences. He’s right.

While great advertising can suggest that a customer place a particular brand in consideration, only a positive experience with the brand will cement the value proposition. Positive brand experiences represent opportunity and advantage by raising barriers to competitors, reducing price pressure, and extending the length of the customer relationship.

Remarkably, brand experiences come in only four flavors: 1) direct product interaction 2) interaction with brand representatives 3) events and 4) environments. Also remarkable, the Internet is the only medium which can provide all four. As an etailer, it’s critical that you build each of these types of experiences into your strategy.

Suddenly, consumers can experience brands directly: through online events, interaction with products, or by visiting the online environments of brands; or they can experience them vicariously: through an eBay Seller’s feedback, a compelling blogger, or a reviewer on Amazon who seems to share their likes and dislikes.

As the online channel becomes the primary delivery point for brand experiences, it’s critical that etailers take advantage of the enormous growth opportunity this trend presents. If your company will participate in this new branding paradigm, it needs to be ready for the voyage. And such a voyage begins with the recognition of which brands matter most to consumers right now.

In the old days, we chose first where to buy, and then (if there was a choice) subsequently what brand to buy. The brand that mattered was the personality and promise of the store owner or clerk.

In the Internet age, consumers increasingly choose the product or brand they wish to purchase first, and then they choose where to buy. Shopping comparison engines bank on just this tendency.

As such, the tools you use to bring these sought-after brand attributes to life should be those which would most quickly and clearly capture the users’ interests in a particular brand or product. After you capture their desire for a particular product or brand (through detailed, relevant, and carefully presented product details, consumer reviews, and other site features) then get them to return to your store next time (based on experiences which are unique to your own brand).

Brands and Consumption Space: May 24 2007

I’m a brand guy. One important aspect of brand is that it functions in memory — when you make a purchase decision (these days) there is rarely a salesperson on hand, rarely a brochure explaining features and benefits. Instead, you form a consideration set based on your memory and belief in particular brands.

From time to time, I try to note (from memory) of all the (national) brands I remember interacting with in one day. So, here’s Thursday May 24, in relatively chronological order; I mention only my first notice of the brand… and I am not counting signs or brands viewed, nor websites or blogs visited — just the brands I directly interact with.

  1. Boston Acoustics
  2. GE
  3. Phillips
  4. Dial
  5. Neutrogena
  6. Edge Gel
  7. Gillette
  8. Kiehl’s
  9. Glaxo-SmithKline (Flovent)
  10. Braun
  11. Arm and Hammer
  12. Hanes
  13. Polo
  14. Brooks Brothers
  15. Tommy Hilfiger
  16. Invicta
  17. Allen Edmonds
  18. Bunn
  19. Thermos
  20. Coach
  21. Booq (now leaving the house)
  22. Saab
  23. NPR
  24. Motorola
  25. Parrot Systems
  26. Apple
  27. Brandi Carlisle
  28. Counting Crows
  29. Feist
  30. Samsung (arriving work)
  31. Levenger (Circa)
  32. Lamy
  33. Staples
  34. HP
  35. Microsoft
  36. Glaceau
  37. AOL (AIM)
  38. Lucent Technologies
  39. Canon
  40. Kodak
  41. Toshiba
  42. City of Rochester (leaving work)
  43. Grey Goose
  44. Sennheiser
  45. Carrier
  46. University of Rochester (leaving speaking event)
  47. Subway
  48. Corona
  49. Gateway
  50. Sony
  51. Comedy Central (The Daily Show)
  52. Serta

Fifty-two brands — not counting the local brands, the brands I saw but with which I didn’t interact, and the brands I viewed online. The bad news (for brands hoping to get my attention) is that I interact with nearly every one of these brands every single day. Every single day. That means I’m continually having experiences which drive my memory or affinity in these brands.

Lastly, note that I didn’t buy anything — other than food or drink — all day.

How do you get through?